Biaxial Geogrid in Soft Soil Road Reinforcement: A Case Study in Subgrade Stabilization

Project Overview

Soft soil foundations present one of the most persistent and costly challenges in road construction worldwide. Weak subgrades—characterized by low bearing capacity, high compressibility, and poor drainage—can lead to excessive settlement, rutting, and premature pavement failure if not properly addressed. Traditional solutions often require excavation and replacement of 500 to 1,000 mm of soft subgrade with granular fill, a material-intensive and time-consuming approach.

This case study examines the application of biaxial geogrid in reinforcing road subgrades over soft soil conditions. Drawing on documented projects from various regions—including the historic Sungei Way trial in Malaysia (1984), the He-Yun Expressway in China, and a coastal expressway project in Zhejiang Province—it demonstrates how biaxial geogrid reinforcement provides a cost-effective, durable, and sustainable alternative to conventional deep excavation methods.

The solution applies to paved and unpaved roads, highway embankments, access roads, and airport pavements—any application where soft subgrade conditions threaten long-term structural performance.


Engineering Challenge

Soft soil foundations create a cascade of engineering problems that undermine road performance:

1. Excessive Settlement

Soft clays, silts, and organic soils exhibit high compressibility under load. When a road embankment is constructed over such soils, primary and secondary consolidation settlements can continue for years or even decades, leading to uneven road surfaces, pavement cracking, and costly maintenance interventions.

2. Differential Settlement

Perhaps more damaging than total settlement is differential settlement—the uneven displacement between adjacent sections of a road. This is particularly acute at the transition between new and existing embankments in road widening projects, and at bridge approaches where the “bump at the end of the bridge” phenomenon (commonly known as “bridge bump”) creates safety hazards and ride quality issues.

3. Low Bearing Capacity

Weak subgrades with California Bearing Ratio (CBR) values as low as 2.5% cannot adequately support traffic loads without excessive deformation. This leads to rutting in unpaved roads and structural failure in pavements.

4. Lateral Displacement

Under embankment loading, soft soils can squeeze laterally, causing slope instability and undermining adjacent structures. The lateral displacement of soft ground can be as damaging to project integrity as vertical settlement.

5. Construction and Cost Constraints

Traditional solutions—excavating and replacing soft soil with imported granular fill—are expensive, time-consuming, and environmentally impactful. Hauling vast quantities of aggregate, disposing of excavated soft soil, and managing construction schedules in poor ground conditions add significant cost and carbon emissions to projects.

The Core Challenge: How can engineers build durable roads over soft ground while reducing material consumption, construction time, and long-term maintenance costs?

Our Solution: Biaxial Geogrid Reinforcement

Biaxial geogrids provide an engineered solution to these challenges through a mechanically stabilized layer (MSL) that transforms weak subgrades into load-bearing foundations.

How It Works

The biaxial geogrid is placed at the interface between the soft subgrade and the overlying granular fill (base or subbase course). Through three primary mechanisms, it improves road performance:

1. Confinement

The geogrid’s apertures (typically 20–50 mm square) confine the granular aggregate, preventing lateral spreading under load. This confinement increases the shear strength of the granular layer and reduces deformation.

2. Interlock

Aggregate particles penetrate the geogrid apertures, creating a mechanical interlock between the geogrid and the granular material. This interlock is mobilized with minimal deformation of the geogrid, providing immediate reinforcement.

3. Tension Membrane Effect

The geogrid develops tensile forces as the subgrade deforms, distributing loads over a wider area and reducing stress on the underlying soft soil.

Recommended Specifications

Parameter Recommendation Justification
Material Polypropylene (PP) biaxial geogrid High strength, chemical resistance, durability
Tensile Strength 30–50 kN/m (standard), up to 120 kN/m (heavy-duty) Match traffic loading and subgrade conditions
Aperture Size 20–50 mm square Optimal aggregate interlock
Placement At subgrade/base interface or within base course Maximum reinforcement efficiency
Coverage Full-width, with minimum 0.5 m overlap Continuous reinforcement

Installation Best Practices

  1. Subgrade Preparation: The soft subgrade is leveled and compacted to provide a uniform surface. If subgrade is extremely soft, a geotextile separator may be placed beneath the geogrid.

  2. Geogrid Placement: The geogrid is rolled out over the prepared subgrade in the direction of construction. Adjacent rolls are overlapped (typically 0.5–1.0 m) and pinned or stapled to maintain position.

  3. Granular Fill Placement: The first lift of granular fill (typically 150–300 mm) is placed over the geogrid. Care must be taken to avoid direct equipment traffic on the exposed geogrid.

  4. Compaction: The granular layer is compacted to specification. The geogrid becomes an integral part of the stabilized layer.

  5. Subsequent Layers: Additional lifts of fill or pavement layers are constructed as per design.


Results & Benefits

Performance Outcomes from Documented Projects

1. Substantial Bearing Capacity Improvement

Plate load tests on reinforced unpaved road sections over soft subgrade showed that biaxial geogrid reinforcement increased bearing capacity by approximately 34.6% when placed within the top one-third of the subgrade layer. This improvement enables roads to carry heavier traffic loads without structural failure.

2. Significant Settlement Reduction

A coastal expressway project in Zhejiang Province, China, employed a combination of “biaxial geogrid + plastic drainage board at 0.8 m spacing.” Field monitoring data showed:

  • 35.8% reduction in cumulative settlement at 6 months post-construction compared to conventional methods

  • Differential settlement gradient controlled to within 0.15%

  • Pavement deflection values stabilized at 0.32 mm (well within the 0.5 mm specification limit)

Another study on a coastal expressway widening project showed that geogrid reinforcement reduced the risk of differential settlement between new and old embankments while significantly improving overall stability.

3. Equivalent Performance with Reduced Section Thickness

Research has demonstrated that a 300 mm granular subbase reinforced with biaxial geogrid can provide equivalent performance to a 450–500 mm unreinforced subbase—representing a material saving of 33–40%.

This thickness reduction translates directly into:

  • Less aggregate extraction and transport

  • Reduced excavation and disposal of unsuitable material

  • Shorter construction timelines

  • Lower project costs

4. Improved Long-Term Durability

The mechanically stabilized layer (MSL) created by biaxial geogrid reinforcement protects the subgrade from excessive damage, reduces maintenance requirements, and enables uninterrupted traffic operations. In one documented access road project in Malaysia, the geogrid-reinforced section prevented the recurring road failures that had previously plagued the estate’s truck access routes.

5. Structural Benefits in Highway Applications

On the He-Yun Expressway in China, bidirectional double-layer geogrid was applied to address differential settlement at earthwork junctions. Analysis confirmed the geogrid’s unique reinforcement properties in controlling settlement and distributing loads.

6. Tensile Deformation Characteristics

Field tests on the Rongwu Expressway in China’s Xiong’an New Area revealed that biaxial geogrid exhibits greater tensile deformation between two pile supports than between four, with transverse tensile deformation exceeding longitudinal deformation. This understanding enables more precise design of geogrid reinforcement in pile-supported embankments.

Cost Efficiency

Area of Savings Typical Impact
Aggregate Volume 33–40% reduction in granular fill thickness
Excavation/Disposal Reduced volume of unsuitable material removal
Construction Time Faster installation compared to deep excavation
Maintenance Reduced frequency and cost of road repairs
Lifecycle Carbon Lower emissions from material transport and compaction


A documented project using geogrid reinforcement saved an estimated £5,000 per kilometer of road (approximately 20–25% of construction cost), with a total project saving of £200,000. Other projects have reported construction time reductions of up to 35% and cost savings of 20% or more.

Real-World Applications

Malaysia’s Pioneering Application (1984–1987)

The Sungei Way trial in 1984 was the precursor to geogrid use in working platforms on soft ground in Malaysia. A two-layer biaxial geogrid system was first used in 1987 to rehabilitate the Pasir Gudang offshore fabrication yard in Johor, Malaysia. The trial results demonstrated that punched and stretched biaxial geogrids in granular base or subbase effectively achieve:

  • Interlock between geogrid and granular material with minimal deformation

  • Minimized tensile strains and deformations in subgrade

  • Confinement of granular materials, minimizing lateral displacement

  • Reduction in rut depth for similar pavement life

Zhejiang Coastal Expressway, China

This project employed a comprehensive monitoring system using BeiDou high-precision positioning and distributed fiber optic sensing. The “biaxial geogrid + plastic drainage board” combination proved highly effective, with measured settlement reductions of 35.8% and deflection values well within specification limits.

Riverview Estate Access Road, Malaysia (2024)

A mechanically stabilized access road project was completed in February 2024 at Riverview Estate in Kampung Titi Ijok, Perak, Malaysia. The initiative used Tensar InterAx Geogrid technology to address road failures caused by soft ground conditions in an oil palm plantation. The trial demonstrated that the geogrid-reinforced section protected the subgrade from excessive damage, reduced maintenance requirements, and enabled uninterrupted truck access during harvesting operations.

Conclusion

Biaxial geogrid reinforcement has proven to be a highly effective solution for road construction over soft soil foundations. The documented evidence from multiple projects across different regions and conditions consistently demonstrates:

  • Bearing capacity improvements of 30–35% or more

  • Settlement reductions of up to 35% compared to conventional methods

  • Material savings of 33–40% through reduced granular fill requirements

  • Cost savings of 20–25% or more on construction

  • Extended service life with reduced maintenance requirements

For engineers and project owners facing the challenges of soft ground construction, biaxial geogrids offer a proven, cost-effective, and sustainable solution that transforms problematic subgrades into stable, durable foundations.


For more information on our biaxial geogrid product range or technical support for your specific project, please visit wordmaterial.com or contact our engineering team.